Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times
PORT CHESTER, N.Y. — Nearly 20 years after he arrived penniless in this
country from Mexico, Moises owns two restaurants, with a third on the
way. He has five employees, an American wife and a stepdaughter. His
food even has a following on Yelp.com.
What Moises does not have is American citizenship, or even a green card
permitting him to reside legally in the United States. So he inhabits an
economic netherworld, shuttling among his establishments on the bus and
train because he cannot get a driver’s license and making do without
bank loans or credit cards even as he files for zoning permits and
incorporation papers.
While the estimated 11 million immigrants here illegally are often
portrayed as dishwashers, farmhands, gardeners and other low-paid
service workers, increasingly they are also business owners and
employers. That is one reason economists say opening the door to
entrepreneurs like Moises — whose last name is being withheld because of
the risk of deportation — could give the American economy a shot in the
arm.
The most prominent feature of the proposed immigration bill
introduced by a bipartisan group of senators last month would provide
residents of the United States who overstayed their visas or arrived
illegally before Dec. 31, 2011, a long and winding path to citizenship,
one that would probably take more than a decade to complete. But less
noticed is that the legislation would offer such residents much more
immediate provisional status, enabling them to work and travel legally.
That status would make it easier for immigrants here illegally to open
businesses, buy big-ticket items like homes and cars and negotiate
raises. All of these help explain why immigration reform is one of the
few things economists on the left and right generally agree on these
days.
While there is considerable debate about whether increased immigration
depresses wages on the low end of the pay scale, most experts say
allowing more new immigrants and offering a more secure legal footing
for workers who are currently in the country illegally would bring the
nation broad economic gains.
“We need more legal immigration,” said Diana Furchtgott-Roth, an
economist at the conservative Manhattan Institute. “Additional human
capital results in more growth.”
Lawrence F. Katz, a liberal professor of economics at Harvard who is
among those who say that immigration can push down pay for workers
directly competing with new immigrants, nevertheless supports the
argument that a freer flow of people from other nations would foster
more growth. “No doubt some individuals are harmed,” he said, “but the
benefits outweigh the costs.”
Some conservative skeptics, though, see a steep price in a broad
amnesty, largely because of increased spending on social services and
entitlements.
The pluses and minuses of more immigration are evident in this
working-class village of 29,000 about 30 miles north of Midtown
Manhattan that shares a border with affluent Greenwich, Conn.
A wave of Hispanic immigrants, both legal and illegal, has transformed
downtown Port Chester, which fell on hard times in the 1980s and ’90s
after factories and mills closed and an older generation of Italian
immigrants moved away or died off.
Today, 59 percent of the village’s population is of Hispanic origin,
said Christopher Gomez, Port Chester’s director of planning and
development. From 1990 to 2010, Port Chester’s population jumped by 17
percent, twice as fast as Westchester County as a whole.
The immigrant influx, he said, has become the “lifeblood” of the town. “I don’t know where we’d be without it.”
Mexican and Peruvian restaurants dot the downtown streets, while
immigrant-owned stores and markets offer goods from Ecuador and services
like money transfers to Guatemala and other Central American countries.
The predominance of Spanish-speaking customers has forced older
businesses to adapt. Chris Rubeo, the owner of Feinsod Hardware on North
Main Street, hired several Spanish-speaking workers to help him compete
with a nearby Home Depot and lure Hispanic contractors and builders.
0 comments :
Post a Comment