ISLAMABAD, July 4: Pakistan and the
International Monetary Fund agreed on Thursday to a $5.3 billion bailout
package. An additional $2bn request will be considered by the IMF Executive
Board on Sept 4.
Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and
Jeffrey Franks, the head of the visiting IMF staff mission, told a joint news
briefing that Pakistan would have to take a number of prior actions, including
reduction in fiscal deficit, implementation of an energy plan to put the sector
on a stable footing, revival of the privatisation programme and making monetary
policy adjustments and, above all, getting these steps approved by the
political leadership at the federal and provincial levels to qualify for
presentation of the package to the IMF management and executive board for
approval.
Mr Dar said the two sides “have
reached an agreement for a 3-year programme of at least $5.3bn under an
Extended Fund Facility”.
He said Pakistan had requested the
IMF management through a conference call to increase the present level of
access of 348 per cent of quota ($5.3bn) to 500pc of quota ($7.3bn) with
appropriate front loading of disbursements to match Pakistan’s repayment
obligations under the previous IMF program-me so that net outflows are not more
than fresh disbursements.
Answering a question about an
increase in electricity rates as required under the programme, the minister
said details of the tariff rationalisation would be announced by the prime
minister as part of his energy plan, but the poorest of the poor would be
protected from tariff adjustments.
“The programme aims at stabilising
Pakistan’s economy and creating an enabling environment for revival of growth,”
he said. He pointed out a long list of policy directions to qualify for the
programme approval by the IMF board.
The list includes fiscal
consolidation, containing inflation, resolution of energy crisis including
settlement of circular debt, promotion of social safety nets, strengthening the
financial sector, improving business climate, promoting foreign investment,
restructuring public sector corporations, reviving the privatisation programme,
strengthening corporate governance and building foreign exchange reserves with
exchange rate stability.
“This agreement will be reviewed by
the IMF management and finalised before going to the executive board, which
will consider the proposed agreement in early September, subject to the timely
completion of prior actions to be taken by the authorities,” said Mr Franks.
He said the entire amount of loan
programme would be payable in three years (36 months) involving about 3pc
floating interest rate and repayable over a period of 10 years, making it
easier for the authorities to service outstanding loans.
Mr Franks said the focus of the
programme was economic growth for which the government would have to take some
difficult decisions necessary to stabilise the economy.
He hoped that the other donors would
also increase their support to Pakistan as almost half of its requirements would
be provided by the IMF while the remaining would have to be arranged through
other lenders like the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and large bilateral
lenders.
He said Pakistan would have to take
a number of prior actions to enable the IMF board to approve the $5.3bn
package.
The actions include reduction in
fiscal deficit to 6 per cent of GDP, introduction of a comprehensive energy
sector reform plan to contain shortages and put it on stable footing,
tightening of monetary policy to keep inflation at an acceptable level,
improving tax collection through administrative measures and plugging of
loopholes in the shape of discretionary tax exemptions, strengthening of public
sector enterprises and privatisation of some of them, simplification of trade policy,
improvement in climate for doing business and protecting the social sector.
Mr Franks said Pakistan would have
to take the entire package to the Council of Common Interests for approval to
ensure that federal and provincial governments were on the same page on fiscal
consolidation. The condition for the CCI approval has been incorporated to
ensure a broad and deep ownership of the bailout package and associated policy
initiatives and reform process.
The minister said the government had
inherited a broken economy and Pakistan had been saddled with huge payment
liabilities of the previous government to retire earlier IMF loans without
having adequate foreign exchange reserves.
“Resources from the previous loan
were not efficiently utilised with the result that sufficient reserves are not
available to service them. We are paying others’ borrowings,” he said when
reminded his party’s slogan of breaking the begging bowl.
The public debt, which was about Rs3
trillion in 1999, has increased to Rs14.5trn as of June 30, 2013, and almost
Rs2trn of which was built up only last year. The debt-to-GDP ratio has
increased to 63pc that will reduce to 61pc this year with a further 2pc cut
next year. “You have to appreciate that your net loan is not going up. We are
not adding to loan, but taking loans to reduce debt stock,” Mr Dar said.
He said the government had
negotiated a home-grown programme. “We are entering a new programme for good of
the country. A better tomorrow dawns only when requisite pains are borne today,
the pains which are the result of the fiscal and financial indiscipline
practised in the last few years.”
Responding to a question about
privatisation, the minister said Pakistan was injecting Rs450bn into the
loss-making entities, which was not sustainable.
The government would have to improve
companies like Railways and PIA to make them profitable and privatise others
which are profitable to reduce this bleeding, he said.
Mr Dar said the IMF had demanded
elimination of all tax exemptions, but en bloc reversal of statutory regulatory
orders (SROs) was not possible and the fund had been convinced that charitable
organisations like Imran Khan’s cancer hospital could not be subjected to
commercial taxes. He, however, said the two sides had agreed to review all SROs
and do away with those created through nepotism and favouritism.
0 comments :
Post a Comment